Green until a point
I think everybody is familiar to the pollution caused by human, so it would be useless to write another article about that. Instead, I will exploit a less known subject, about the consequences of a fully 'nature-friendly' society.
1. One of those obstacles was described in 'The time machine' by H. G. Wells, where one group of people decided to live on the surface, while the other developed farther and separated by living underground. So a 100% enviromental-friendly society could cause a major disrupt between the species.
2. Biologists usually say that when life appears, it's only a matter of time until the first intelligent being appears. So, there is a hypothesis that if human would go back to 'Mother Nature', another species (my guess is cats or dogs, they already enslaved us) will become the apex. It will have the same evolution as us, then it will fall too, another species appears, it falls and so on forever.
3. It may bring us back to the stone age. Yes guys, you will become friends with the Flintstones! After some generations, all the technological information may be lost. The hard work made by every human could be lost.
This was for today's article. Have a nice day!
No offense, but your arguments on this issue are completely atrocious. In your argument, it seems that you believe that being completely green would mean to allow nature to take back our cities and live like hunter-gatherers to help pay for our mistakes, but no one ever would allow a radical idea like this to take place. Ever since the Agricultural Revolution thousands of years ago, humans started living in crowded cities and domesticating plants and animals for their own needs, but this hasn't affected nature as much as what modern times have done. The biggest issues today concerning the environment such as climate change and pollution have sprouted up because of the Industrial Revolution in the 1800's. To better address this issue, actually talk about how radical people propose about how we should deal with pollution now.
ReplyDeleteBlog Article Rating: 3/10
I know, I know, this was junk. But... it was a first try, after all!
DeleteIt's not like I posted it in the New York Times.
DeleteIf you want something better, read the Russian Civil War. Part 4 coming soon...!
DeleteWell, I don't know if it's something that can be placed in The New York Times or not, cuz I don't read either!
DeleteThat explains much...
DeleteOh, and by the way, toma&co.!
ReplyDeleteJust mentioning how cats and dogs rule over us is kinda suspicious . . .
Oh, and by the way, flowey the freaking flower!
DeleteYou commenting here is kinda suspicious...
Cringe comeback . . .
DeleteYou ain't any better, "big boy".
Delete*GASP* Oh no, you didn't!
DeleteI still do hate you.
DeleteThanks for the reminder!
Delete*ILCAD Moment*
ReplyDeleteAs the owner of this site, I can delete you. Now, behave yourself, idiot.
Delete